Use of a leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRA) for asthma management did not increase the risk of neuropsychiatric disease, based on data from more than 60,000 asthma patients.
Although LTRAs are established as an effective drug for asthma, the US Food and Drug Administration warnings of the risk for neuropsychiatric (NP) drug reactions — including a black box warning for montelukast (Singulair) — has raised concerns, writes Ji-Su Shim, MD, of Ewha Womans University, Seoul, South Korea, and colleagues.
However, evidence for such an association is limited, and previous studies have focused only on children and adolescents, and on a single LTRA (montelukast), the researchers say.
In a study published last month in the Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice, the researchers used a Korean national health insurance database to identify 61,571 adult patients with asthma aged 40 years and older between January 2002 and December 2015 with no history of LTRA use.
The patients underwent screening examinations between January 2009 and December 2010, which marked the start of a follow-up period ending on December 31, 2015. The median age of the study population was 61 years, and the mean follow-up period for NPs or other outcomes was approximately 47.6 months for LTRA users and 46.5 months for nonusers. Overall, 11.1% of the study population used pranlukast (Onon), 11% used montelukast, and 0.24% used zafirlukast (Accolate).
A total of 12,168 patients took an LTRA during the follow-up period. The hazard ratio for newly diagnosed neuropsychiatric diseases was not significantly different between LTRA users and nonusers (hazard ratio 1.01, P = .952) in an adjusted model that included age, sex, pack-years of smoking, alcohol use, physical activity, body mass index, comorbid conditions, other respiratory diseases, and use of other asthma medications.
The most common NPs were dementia, mood disorders, and panic disorders, and the prevalence of each was not significantly different between LTRA users and nonusers (75.4% vs. 76.1% for dementia, 12.7% vs. 12.8% for mood disorders, and 5.6% vs. 3.5% for panic disorders).
A subgroup analysis for associations between the duration of LTRA use and NP disease risk also showed no significant difference between LTRA users and nonusers.
“The mechanism of the development of NP symptoms by LTRAs has not been identified,” the researchers write in their discussion of the study findings. “Because most of NP side effects due to montelukast occur in few patients within 2 weeks of drug administration, it also may have relation with the presence of some genetic polymorphisms involving modification of the normal action or metabolism of LTRAs,” they explained.
The FDA’s black box warning for montelukast noting the risk of serious mental health side effects has renewed interest in the relationship between NPs and LTRAs, the researchers noted. However, the current study findings support previous randomized controlled trials and larger studies, and the current warnings are based mainly on pharmacovigilance studies, case series, and case reports, they said.
The study findings were limited by several factors, including the retrospective design, the potential for misclassification of asthma diagnosis, the exclusion of temporary NP symptoms that might prompt LTRA discontinuation, and the inability to detect possible differences in ethnicities other than Korean, the researchers note.
However, the results suggest that adverse NP symptoms should not prevent physicians from prescribing LTRAs to selected patients with asthma. Instead, the physician should accompany the prescription with “a word of caution in case any mood changes might occur,” the investigators wrote.
“Further studies, such as randomized controlled trials, are needed to reveal the association between the use of LTRAs and the risk of NP events and/or diseases,” they concluded.
Potential Genetic Predisposition May Drive Cases
The relatively rare occurrence of NP symptoms in asthma patients using LTRAs has prompted questions from the medical community on whether the relationship really exists, writes Désirée Larenas-Linnemann, MD, of Médica Sur Clinical Foundation and Hospital, Mexico City, Mexico, in an accompanying editorial.
The current study provides information about medications and possible adverse drug reactions, but “great care should be taken in the interpretation of the results from such a study,” she notes. Limitations include not only the possible misclassification of asthma and the homogenous study population, but also the fact that some NPs, such as dementia, are already common in older adults..
Larenas-Linnemann shared a story of one of her patients, a 2 ½ -year-old boy who began exhibiting hyperactivity and other strange behaviors while on an LRTA. The toddler’s father had previously reported “horrible nightmares, strange thoughts, and to feel upset, unsecure until he suspended the medication.” Cases such as this support a potential genetic predisposition, with drug metabolism playing a role, and clinicians should take genetic backgrounds into account, she said.
“Even though the current study did not show an association between LTRA use or duration of exposure and the occurrence of NP diseases in Korean adults with asthma, this does not imply such a relationship might be present in other age groups (children-adolescents-adults up to 50 years) or in patients with a different genetic background,” she emphasized.
However, “In the meantime, although LTRA should continue to be prescribed if indicated, an index of suspicion for possible NP effects should be maintained,” Larenas-Linnemann concluded.
“This study is timely, since the black box warning for montelukast was issued approximately 1 year ago by the FDA,” Thomas B. Casale, MD, of the University of South Florida, Tampa, said in an interview with Medscape Medical News.
Casale said he was not surprised by the findings, “since most of the data implicating a potential link between the use of montelukast and neuropsychiatric disorders have not been particularly compelling,” and much of the current information comes from case reports and retrospective studies.
“Furthermore, the data appeared to be somewhat stronger in the pediatric population,” Casale noted. “This study focused on elderly patients (mean age 61) and included two other leukotriene modifiers. The number of patients receiving montelukast was small (56), which may have also confounded the results,” he noted.
As for clinical implications, “I don’t think this study will change practice,” Casale said. “As indicated, it is in an elderly population, included only a limited number of patients receiving montelukast, and was in a Korean cohort. All of these factors could have influenced the results,” and the data may not be generalizable to patients elsewhere, including the United States, he said. “Also, the study only included patients with asthma and in the United States; the approval for rhinitis is another important indication to study,” he noted.
Additional research is needed in the form of better prospective studies examining the potential link between montelukast and neuropsychiatric disorders in both the pediatric and adult populations having either asthma or rhinitis, Casale concluded.
The study received no outside funding. The researchers and Casale have disclosed no relevant financial relationships. Larenas-Linnemann disclosed personal fees from Allakos, Armstrong, AstraZeneca, Chiesi, DBV Technologies, Grünenthal, GSK, Mylan/Viatris, Menarini, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, Siegfried, UCB, Alakos, Gossamer, and Carnot, and grants from Sanofi, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Circassia, UCB, GSK, and the Purina Institute.
Content Source: https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/965933?src=rss